Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Impoliteness in Power-imbalance and Power-neutral Relational Contexts: Evidence from a Persian TV Drama
Abstract
This study investigated impoliteness in relational contexts. Interlocutors analyzed the data from a Persian TV drama from two perspectives: intentionality and perception of impoliteness. Two relational contexts were identified: power-imbalance and power-neutral, each comprising two types of impoliteness: reciprocal and non-reciprocal. Reciprocal impoliteness occurred in hostile and conflictual situations where impoliteness was both intended by the speaker and perceived by the recipient as a direct face-attack. In non-reciprocal impoliteness, however, when power imbalance was due to family hierarchy, the recipient of impoliteness remained silent; in other situations, the intentional face-attack was tolerated, unless the recipient’s social identity face was directly attacked. In power-neutral situations, impoliteness was not reciprocated when intimacy existed between the interactants. It was neither intended nor perceived as face-threatening; however, direct face-attack was reciprocal in hostile situations. The findings of the present study point to the significant role of the relational context in the interpretation of impoliteness.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmed, A. (2012). Women and soap-operas: Popularity, portrayal and perception. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 2(6), 1- 6.
Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bousfield, D. & Locher, M. (Eds.) (2008). Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay
with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brunsdon, C. (2000). The feminist, the housewife, and the soap opera. New York: Oxford.
Çevik, B. Senem (2014). Turkish Soap Opera Diplomacy: A Western Projection by a
Muslim Source. Exchange: The Journal of Public Diplomacy, 5 (1), 78-103.
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349-
Culpeper, J. (2005). Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The
Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 35-72.
Culpeper, J. (2011). Politeness and impoliteness. In Karin Aijmer and Gisle Andersen (Eds.),
Pragmatics and Society, (pp. 391-436). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Culpeper, J., Boufield, D., & Wichmann, A. (2003). Impoliteness revisited: with special
reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(10-11), 1545-1579.
Culpeper, J. & Hardaker, C. (2017). Impoliteness. In Culpeper, J., Haugh, M., Kádár, D. (Eds.), Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness (pp.199-225). Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke.
Dzo'ul Milal, A., Pramono, A. C. (2021). Impoliteness Addressed to Different Genders and their Responses in The Kitchen Nightmares, a TV Reality Show. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 3(2), 131-146.
Gannon, C. (2009). Feminism & soap opera. Social & Political Review 19: 87-97. Dublin: Trinity College.
Ghazzoul, N. (2019). Linguistic and pragmatic failure of Arab learners in direct polite
requests and invitations: A cross-cultural study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 9(2), 223-230. DOI: http://dsh.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0902.13.
Harris, L., Gergen, K., & Lannaman, J. (1986). Aggression Rituals. Communication Monographs, 53, 252–265.
Haryanti, R. Duwi (2016). A sociopragmatic analysis of interruptions by the male characters
in Marc Cherry’s Desperate Housewives, Season 1 TV series. MA thesis, Yogakarta State University, Indonesia.
Hohenstein, S. & Thalmann, K. (2019). Difficult women: Changing representations of female
characters in contemporary television series. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 67(2), 109-129. https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2019-0012
Izzani, M. (2020). Address terms used by the characters of Brooklyn nine-nine television
show: A sociopragmatic analysi. Bachelor thesis, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan.
Keshavarz, M. H., Cetereisi, Y, & Asit, G. (2020). Pragmatic features of compliments in a
Turkish TV drama. Journal of Pragmatic Research, 2(1), 1-25.
Khatib, M., & Lotfi, K. (2015). Impoliteness and power: An interlanguage pragmatic approach to the use of impolite patterns in terms of power. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 15, 43-67.
Khazdouzian, Y. (2018). The Effects of TV Series on Pragmatic Development. MA Thesis,
Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.
Laitenen, M. (2011). Breaking the Rules of Communication: Verbal and Nonverbal Impoliteness in the American Hospital Drama House M.D. Master’s Thesis. Jyväskylä: English Study Program, Department of Languages University of Jyväskilä.
Lambertz, K., & Hebrok, M. (2011). Women’s Language in Soap Operas. Griffith Working Papers in Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication 4, 1(2), 39‐54.
Limberg, H. (2009). Impoliteness and threat responses. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(7), 1376-
Locher, M. (2006). Polite behaviour within relational work. The discursive approach to politeness. Multilingua 25(3), 249-267.
Locher, Marian A. & Watts, Richard J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal
of Politeness Research 1(1), 9-33.
Mills, S. (2009). Impoliteness in a cultural context. Pragmatics 41(5), 1047-1060.
Mueller, A. & Pilar, Garcés-Conejos B. (2013). Impoliteness in polylogal interaction: Accounting for face-threat witnesses’ responses. Journal of Pragmatics 53: 112-130.
Rose, K. R. (2001). Compliments and compliment responses in film: Implications for pragmatics research and language teaching. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 309–326
Van Der Bom, I. & Mills, S. (2015). A discursive approach to the analysis of politeness data.
Journal of Politeness Research, 11(2), 179-206.
Watts, Richard J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v4i1.41-59
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Mohammad Hossein Keshavarz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Contact Us: Jl. Lingkar Salatiga Km. 02, Pulutan, Sidorejo, Salatiga, Central Java, Indonesia