Hedges in Students’ Reflective Feedback: Evidence from an Online Class during COVID-19 Outbreak

Arina Isti'anah, Anindita Dewangga Puri

Abstract


Scholars have observed hedges in academic writing, yet the examination of hedges in students’ reflective feedback is scarcely found. During the Covid-19 pandemic, both teachers and students face difficulty engaging themselves in online classes. To figure out how students show their attitude, among others, is through reflective feedback. One of the language features pivotal in reflective feedback is ‘hedge’, a pragmatic feature representing a speaker’s tentativeness and possibility in communication (Lakoff, 1973). This paper addresses two questions: (1) what types of hedges are used in the students’ reflective feedback in online class during the covid-19 outbreak? and (2) what are the functions of the hedges? This paper took 151 samples of students’ reflective feedback in the introduction to English linguistics class at Sanata Dharma University to answer those problems. Findings reveal that the students dominantly used modal auxiliaries and epistemic adverbs as the types of hedges as a politeness technique to convey their anxiety and hesitation during an online class.

Keywords: hedges, reflective feedback, online class


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmed, W. K., & Maros, M. (2017). Using Hedges as Relational Work by Arab EFL Students in Student-Supervisor Consultations. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 17(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2017-1701-06

Azizah, D. N. (2021). Hedges Function in Masculine and Feminine Feature’s Language: A Pragmatics Analysis. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 3(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v3i1.59-69

Cheng, P., & Ding, R. (2021). The effect of online review exercises on student course engagement and learning performance: A case study of an introductory financial accounting course at an international joint venture university. Journal of Accounting Education, 54, 100699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2020.100699

Ducasse, A. M., & Hill, K. (2019). Developing Student Feedback Literacy Using Educational Technology and the Reflective Feedback Conversation. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 12(1), 24–37.

Hasanah, U., & Wahyudi, R. (2015). Meaning-making of hedges in the gossip column of The Jakarta Post. Humaniora, 27(2), 207–216.

Hill, K., & Fitzgerald, R. (2020). Student perspectives on the impact of COVID-19 on learning. AISHE, 12(2), 1–9.

Hooi, C. M., & Shuib, M. (2014). An Analysis of Hedging Devices in Complaint Business Letters. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 14(03), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.17576/GEMA-2014-1403-08

Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London ; New York: Continuum.

Jokhan, A., Sharma, B., & Singh, S. (2019). Early warning system as a predictor for student performance in higher education blended courses. Studies in Higher Education, 44(11), 1900–1911. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1466872

Kartikasari, I. (2019). Comparison of Hedging Devices in Published Research Articles by Indonesian and English Native Writers: A Corpus Based Study. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 7(2), 38–45.

Lakoff, G. (1973). A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2(4), 458–508.

Nguyen Thi Thuy, T. (2018). A Corpus-Based Study on Cross-Cultural Divergence in the Use of Hedges in Academic Research Articles Written by Vietnamese and Native English-Speaking Authors. Social Sciences, 7(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7040070

Rezaie, M., & Taki, S. (2014). Hedging Expressions in English and Persian MA and PhD Theses: The Case of Iranian Learners. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(20), 2339–2349. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n20p2339

Rizun, M., & Strzelecki, A. (2020). Students’ Acceptance of the COVID-19 Impact on Shifting Higher Education to Distance Learning in Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6468. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186468

Salichah, I., Irawati, E., & Basthomi, Y. (2015). Hedges and Boosters in Undergraduate Students’ Research Articles. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 3(2), 154–160.

Sanjaya, I. N. S., Sitawati, A. A. R., & Suciani, N. K. (2015). Comparing hedges used by English and Indonesian scholars in piblished research articles: A corpus-based study. TEFLIN Journal - A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 26(2), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/209-227

Tabatabaei, M. A., & Ramzi, S. (2015). The Use of Hedges and Boosters in Monolingual and Bilingual EFL Learners’ Academic Writings: The Case of Iranian Male and Female Post-graduate MA Articles. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(12), 131–141.

Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836

Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2020). Learning management systems: A review of the research methodology literature in Australia and China. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2020.1737002

Vebriyanto, D. A., Mujiyanto, J., & Fitriati, S. W. (2019). Types and Functions of Hedges and Boosters in Graduate Students’ Research Articles. English Education Journal, 9(4), 565–574.

Veine, S., Anderson, M. K., Andersen, N. H., Espenes, T. C., Søyland, T. B., Wallin, P., & Reams, J. (2020). Reflection as a core student learning activity in higher education—Insights from nearly two decades of academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1659797




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v3i2.86-96

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Arina Isti'anah, Anindita Dewangga Puri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Published by:  UIN Salatiga, ISSN  2656-8020  (Media Online)
Intending to improve the journal's quality since 28th October 2022, this journal has officially cooperated with INaPrA (Indonesian Pragmatics Association). See The MoU Manuscript.

Contact Us: Jl. Lingkar Salatiga Km. 02, Pulutan, Sidorejo, Salatiga, Central Java, Indonesia