.png){kind=tracking}
Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Speech Act Analysis of Madurese Wedding Ceremony in Kalidandan Village, Pakuniran, Probolinggo
Abstract
Pragmatics is the study of those relations between language and context that are grammaticalized, or encoded in the structure of language. This study aims to describe kinds of speech acts especially locutionary act, illocutionary act, and the perlocutionary act of Madurese wedding ceremony in Kalidandan village, Pakuniran district, Probolinggo regency. The results of this study showed that the illocutionary act of the Madurese wedding ceremony in Kalidandan village, Pakuniran district, Probolinggo regency has various kinds of speech act, 1) direct speech act; 2) indirect speech act; 3) literal speech act; 4) non-literal speech act; 5) direct literal speech act; 6) indirect literal speech act; 7) direct non-literal speech act, and 8) indirect non-literal speech act.
Keywords: Speech act, Kinds of speech act, and Madurese
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.
Bach, K. (1999). The Semantics-Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View. Elsevier, 65--84.
Bawa, I. W. (2004). Wibawa Bahasa. Program Pascasarjana (S2-S3) Linguistik Universitas Udayana.
Fetrina Rahma Dewi. (2010). Geografi Dialek Bahasa Madura Di Daerah Pesisir Probolinggo. Artikulasi, 9(1), 609–622.
Foley, W. . (1977). Anthropological Linguistics. Blackwell Publisher Inc.
Hodge, R. and G. K. (1988). Social Semiotics. Polity Press.
Jendra, I. W. (2009). Intisari Sejarah Linguistik. Paramita.
Leech, G. (1983). The Principles of Pragmatics. Longman.
Levinson, C. S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Licea-Haquet, G. L., Velásquez-Upegui, E. P., Holtgraves, T., & Giordano, M. (2019). Speech act recognition in Spanish speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 141, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.013
Moleong, L. J. (2004). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nababan, P. W. . (1987). Ilmu Pragmatik (Teori dan Penerapannya). Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Proyek Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan.
Searle, John, 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Searle, John, 1975. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In: Günderson, K. (Ed.), Language, Mind and Knowledge, vol. 7. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 344e369.
Searle, R. J. (1977). Speech Act. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, R. J. (1979). Expression and Meaning. Cambridge University Press.
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Aanalisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistik. Duta Wacana University Press.
Tarigan, H. G. (1983). Menyimak sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Angkasa.
Tsoumou, J. M. (2020). Analyzing speech acts in politically related Facebook communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 167, 80–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.06.004
Weigand, Edda, 2010. Dialogue: The Mixed Game. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
Wijana, I. D. P. (1996). Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Andi.
Wijana, I. D. P. dan M. R. (2011). Analisis Wacana Pragmatik, Kajian Teori dan Analisis. Yuma Pustaka.
Yoschitake, Masaki, 2004. Critique of J. L. Austin's speech act theory: Decentralization of the speaker-Centered meaning in communication. Kyushu Communication Studies 2, 27e43 (Communication Association of Japan Kyushu Chapter).
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v2i2.113-126
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Anwari Anwari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Contact Us: Jl. Lingkar Salatiga Km. 02, Pulutan, Sidorejo, Salatiga, Central Java, Indonesia