Analysis of Mathematics National Exam Questions based on TIMSS Taxonomy
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to find out the spread out content and cognitive dimension of the question of Mathematics National Exam for Junior High School (SMP) / Islamic Junior High School (MTs) in the school year of 2005/2006-2018/2019 and find out the suitability question of Mathematics Final Exam in Junior High School based on government guidelines and TIMSS taxonomy. This type of research is a qualitative approach. This research use collection data with document analysis. Data analysis techniques consist of data reduction, data display, and verification. The research subjects were in the form of 14 SMP / MTs national mathematics exam texts from the 2005/2006 to 2018/2019 academic year. The indicators of content dimensions and cognitive dimensions used are based on the TIMSS taxonomy. Checking the validity of the data, the researcher uses a triangulation by an expert through Online FGD (Focus Group Discussion).
The research result as follows: 1. An analysis a question of Mathematics Final Exam in Junior High School in the school year of 2005/2006-2018/2019 based on a taxonomy TIMSS obtain results that percentage spread of content and cognitive dimension still not appropriate yet with TIMSS Assessment Framework. At the content dimension, the spread of a question dominated by geometry domain while data and probability have spread of a question very few. Then, algebra and number domain pretty close proportion which have been specified by TIMSS. 2. the question of Mathematics Final Exam in Junior High School to the scope of material which set by the government was not given percentage distribution of materials obviously while cognitive level from government obtains a result that different with findings result in the researcher based on TIMSS taxonomy because there is different definition at government cognitive level from with TIMSS cognitive domain. There is a question that includes an application in government cognitive level however it includes knowing domain based on TIMSS taxonomy. Suitability a question of Final Exam from the school year of 2005/2006 till 2018/2019 indicate there are percentages increase from year to year close appropriate to proportion TIMSS Assessment Framework. It shows the percentage each other domain close proportion TIMSS in content and cognitive dimension.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aminah, A. N. (2021). Kemendikbud Sebut Tingkat Kesulitan Soal UN Tidak Berubah. www.Republika.co.id. https://republika.co.id/berita/pendidikan/eduaction/popr4s384/kemendikbud-sebut-tingkat-kesulitan-soal-un-tidak-berubah
Asrul, Ananda, R., & Rosinta. (2014). Evaluasi Pembajalaran. In Ciptapustaka Media.
Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2017). Buku Saku UN. https://bsnp-indonesia.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Buku-Saku-UN-6-Des-2017-Edit-21-Maret-2018.pdf
Damaledo, Y. D. (2019). Ujian Nasional Dihapus Mendikbud dan Sejarahnya di Indonesia. Www.Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/ujian-nasional-dihapus-mendikbud-dan-sejarahnya-di-indonesia-enkH
Fahmi, A. (2011). Desain Model Sistem Ujian Online. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi & Komunikasi Terapan 2011 (Semantik 2011), 2011(Semantik), 1–15.
Hadi, S., & Novaliyosi. (2019). TIMSS Indonesia (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study). Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call For Papers Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Siliwangi, 562–569.
Lestari, S. D. (2018). Implementasi Pendekatan Ilmiah pada Pembelajaran Matematika di Kelas VII SMPN 3 Mranggen Tahun Ajaran 2013 / 2014. 1(20), 309–317.
Makdori, Y. (2019). Mengenal Konsep Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum Pengganti Ujian Nasional. Www.Liputan6.Com. https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/4131579/mengenal-konsep-asesmen-kompetensi-minimum-pengganti-ujian-nasional#:~:text=Mendikbud telah menyiapkan pengganti UN,minimal yang dibutuhkan para siswi.
Mawarni, Y. E. (2020). Analisis Isi Buku Matematika Kurikulum 2013 Smp Kelas Viii Semester 1 Berdasarkan Taksonomi Timss. Jurnal VARIDIKA, 31(2), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v31i2.10214
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O. (2019). TIMSS 2019 Mathematics Assessment Framework. TIMSS 2019 Assessment Frameworks. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/frameworks/
Prasetyo, D. A. B., & Rudhito, M. A. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan dan Kesulitan Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal geometri Model TIMSS. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 21(2), 122–128.
Prastowo, A., Kurikulum, T., Dasar, P., Menengah, D. A. N., Indonesia, D. I., & Prastowo, A. (2018). JIP:Jurnal Ilmiah PGMI Volume 4 No 2, Desember 2018 Transformasi Kurikulum Pendidikan Dasar..... Andi Prastowo. 4(2), 111–125.
Pratiwi, I. (2016). Pengembangan Soal Matematika Berkarakteristik Timss Tipe Pemecahan Masalah Pada Topik Geometri Pengukuran Volume Kubus Dan Balok Kelas Viii. June.
Sumaryono. (2016). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika. Journal for Research Mathematics Education, 28(1), 331–354. https://www.jstor.org/stable/749784?read-now=1&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Wulan, E. R., & Rusdiana. (2013). Buku Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Pustaka Setia.
www.pusmenjar.kemdikbud.go.id. (2019a). Laporan Hasil Ujian Nasional. https://pusmenjar.kemdikbud.go.id/hasil-un/
www.pusmenjar.kemdikbud.go.id. (2019b). Ujian Nasional. https://pusmenjar.kemdikbud.go.id/ujian-nasional-un/
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/hipotenusa.v3i1.4367
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Nur Colis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.