Presupposition in The Mystery and Thriller Film of “Escape from Pretoria"

Haryati Haryati

Abstract


Presupposition itself has been a cause of the diversity of interpretations since presupposition sticks to utterances, sometimes unsaid clearly, that will provide implied meanings based on the context that is being talked about. The purposes of the study are to investigate three major points: the kinds of presupposition, their functions, and the percentage of each presupposition in the mystery and thriller film script of “Escape from Pretoria” by Francis Annan. This research used a qualitative method to analyze the obtained data. The observation is also used to collect data in which data are obtained from film scripts. The writer applies Yule’s theory (1996) to analyze the presupposition kinds, Halliday’s theory (2003) to analyze presupposition functions, and Subana’s formula to gain the percentage of each presupposition. As a result, there were 177 presuppositions obtained in the film script, with 166 existential presuppositions (93.8%), six factive presuppositions (3.4%), four lexical presuppositions (2.2%,) and one counterfactual presupposition (0.6%). From 177 presuppositions, the data were classified into 23 regulatory functions (13.0%), 2 interactional functions (1.1%), 57 representational functions (32.2%), 79 personal functions (44.6%), 1 imaginative function (0.6%), 4 instrumental functions (2.3%) and 11 heuristic functions (6.2%). Therefore, the dominant presupposition is existential, and the dominant function of presupposition is personal. 

Keywords: film script of Escape from Pretoria, pragmatics, presupposition


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ambrosio, Y.M. Binalet, C. Ferrer, R. & Yang, J. (2015). Analysis of Language Functions in Children’’s Classroom Discourse. International Journal of Education and Research. 3 (2), 105- 114.

Armstrong. E.M., & Ferguson, A. (2010). Language, Meaning, Context and Functional Communication. Journal of Research Online, 24 (4), 480-496.

Arwood, E.L. (2011). Language Function. London: Jessica Kingsley Publisher

Bonyadi. A & Samuel, M. (2011). Linguistic Nature of Presupposition in American and Persian Newspaper Editorials. International Journal of Linguistics, 3(1). DOI:10.5296/ijl.v3i1.554

Cruse, D. A. (2000). Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. University of Manchester: Oxford University Press.

Davies, A. (2007). An Introduction to Applied Linguistics. Edinburgh: University Press

Halliday, M.A.K. (2003). Language and the order of nature. In J. Webster (Ed.),

On language and linguistics: Volume 3 in the Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday

(pp. 116-138). London: Continuum

Hudson, G. (2000). Essential introductory linguistics. Michigan: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Khalili, E. (2017). An analysis of presupposition used in The Wrestler. Scinzer Journal of Humanities 3(2), 83-87. DOI: 10.21634/SJH.3.1.5362

Kristy, Y., Deliana, D., & Harefa, Y. (2020). PRESUPPOSITION IN BEAUTY AND THE BEAST MOVIE SCRIPT. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 4(2), 375-383.

Liang, R & Liu, Y. (2016). An Analysis of Presupposition Triggers in Hilary Clinton’s First Campaign Speech. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(5). doi:10.5539/ijel.v6n5p68

McKinney, J. (2013). Understanding and applying research design. Jhon Wiley and Sons Inc

Murillo, M. A., & Yeh, A. (2021). The Failed Rhetoric: Presupposition Analysis on Duterte’s 5th State of the Nation Address. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 3(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v3i2.587

Oktoma, E., & Mardiyono, S. (2013). The analysis of presupposition in the short stories of Silvester Goridus Sukur. English Review: Journal of English Education, 2(1), 73-83.

Rizqy, H.A., & Ardi, H. (2020). A Pragmatic Analysis of Politeness Strategies of

Directive Expression Reflected in ‘Inglorious Basterds’ Movie. Journal of English Language

and Literature, 9(4), 394-402. https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v9i4.110342

Saeed, J. I. (2016). Semantics (4th edition): Oxford University Press.

Setyowati, R. & Lubis, I.S. (2020). Language Functions in Public Service Advertisements: Gerakan Literasi Nasional (GLN). Jurnal of culture, art, literature and linguistics, 6(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/calls.v6i1.3146

Siahaan, C. K., & Mubarak, Z. H. (2020). An Analysis of Presupposition Found in the Guardian News: Pragmatical Approach. JEE (Journal of English Education), 6(1), 1-1.

Susanthi, I. G. A. A. D., Muliawan, M. S. D., & Suarjaya, A. A. G. (2021). The Language Functions Used in Guiding Conversation: Pragmatics Approach. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 7(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.7.1.2903.1-9

Thoyyibah, L. (2017). Presupposition Triggers-a Comparative Analysis between Oral News and Written Online News Discourse. JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy), 1(2), 10-23.

Yule, G. (2006). The Study of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v4i2.122-136

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Haryati Haryati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Pragmatics Research, (JoPR), E-ISSN: 2656-8020, is published by State Institute of Islamic Studies, (IAIN) Salatiga, Indonesia. it is an International forum published every April and October.