A Survey of Infringements of Gricean Maxims in Some Precautionary Inscriptions on Medicine Packets

Rosarri C. Mbisike


In communication, participants are expected to cooperate through observing a set of maxims. Nevertheless, some communicative instances reveal that there are cases of unintentional non-observance of the maxims, which Grice (1975) categorized as “infringing a maxim”. These instances of infringements call for attention to the extent that they could cause breakdown in communication. In this regard, the aim of this paper is to investigate some cases of infringements of the maxims in selected precautionary inscriptions on some medicine packets, with the objective to examine how such messages are interpreted. The theoretical framework adopted for this research is based on Gricean pragmatics. The method for this research is qualitative and its paradigm is interpretive. The data were collected from some packets of medicine sold in some pharmacy shops in Lagos, Nigeria. One of the major observations made in the course of this research is that, out of the four classes of the Gricean maxims, only the maxim of quality was not infringed in any precautionary inscription in the data. This result may be justified by the reason that precautionary inscriptions on medicine packets should be carefully couched in truth, so as not to jeopardize the health of the patients. Further studies on various cases of infringements in diverse aspects of communication are strongly recommended.

Keywords: Precautionary Inscriptions; Communication; Pragmatics; Maxims; Infringements

Full Text:



Akmajian, A. et al (2012). Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication. (Sixth Edition). Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Ambarsari, P. (2016). The Realization of the Conversational Maxims in the Comic Strip “The Born Loser” of The Jakarta Post. Graduate Program, English Education Department, Semarang State University

Auta, A., Shalkur, D., Banwat, S. B. and Dayom, D. W. (2011). “Readability of Malaria Medicine Information Leaflets in Nigeria”. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 10 (5): 631 – 635.

Baig, S., Javed, F., Siddiquah, A., and Khanam, A. (2021). “A Content Analysis of English Textbook of Punjab Textbook Board of Grade 8 in Pakistan”. In SAGE Open, April – June 2021: 1 – 8. DOI: 10.1177/2158244021102319.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method”. In Qualitative

Research Journal, 9 (2), Article 27.

Bradley, B., Singleton, M. and Li Wan Po, A. (1994). “Readability of Patient Information Leaflets on Over-the-Counter (OTC) Medicines”. Journal of Clinical Pharmacyand Therapeutics, 19: 7 – 15.

Grice, H. P. (1975). “Logic and Conversation” In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, Vol 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 41-58.

Griffin, J. P. and Griffin, J. R. (1996).“Informing the Patient”. Journal of the Royal College of

Physicians of London, 30 (2): 107 – 111.

Hanifah, I. R. (2013). “Non-Observance of Maxims in Facebook Conversation”. In Passage, 1 (2): 135 – 144.

Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kempson, R. (1975). Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

--------------- (1977). Semantic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Mbisike, R. C. (2001). “Investigating English Semantics and Pragmatics”. In Fakoya, A. A. and Ogunpitan, S. A. (eds.) The English Compendium. Vols. 3 & 4. A publication of the Department of English, Faculty of Arts, Lagos State University, Lagos, Nigeria. Pp. 167 – 187.

Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction (Second Edition). Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.

Osunbade, N. and Adeniji, A. (2014). “Information-based Infringements and Implicit Meanings in Conversations in Select Recent Nigerian Novels”. In International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, Vol 4, No. 5(1). Pp. 144 – 151.

Sadock, J. M. (1978). “On Testing for Conversational Implicature.in Cole, P. (ed.) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1981). “Pragmatics”. In Cognition, Vol. 10. Pp 281 – 286.

Stalnaker, R. (1972). “Pragmatics”. In Davidson, D. and Harman, G. (eds.) Semantics of Natural Language. Lordrocht. Pp 380 – 397.

Stanley, J. (2000). “Context and Logical Form”. In Linguistics and Philosophy, Vol. 23. Pp 391 – 424.

Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. New York: Arnold.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Yusuf, Y.K. and Odebunmi, A. (2011). “The Discourse of Information Leaflets of Medicines”. Ibadan Journal of English Studies, Vol. 7. Pp 21 – 39.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v3i2.160-172


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Rosarri C. Mbisike

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Pragmatics Research, (JoPR), E-ISSN: 2656-8020, is published by State Institute of Islamic Studies, (IAIN) Salatiga, Indonesia. it is an International forum published every April and October.