Metaphors Trump’s Discourse ‘Lives by’: are they Mere Pervasive Linguistic Clichés or Persuasive Tools?

Abidi Hajer

Abstract


The present paper re-addresses metaphor based on Conceptual Metaphor Theory from a Critical Discourse Analysis perspective. The metaphors selected pertain to political discourse, precisely Trump’s statements on different occasions and from different sources (Twitter, YouTube). Analyzing metaphors was achieved by recourse to the identification of the source and target domains. It has been found that metaphors, albeit multi-functional persuasive tools, on so many occasions, are based on quibbles and clichéd linguistic expressions trajectories. Additionally, it has been found that metaphors acquire their effectiveness from contextual and lexical cues, in conjunction with the parameter of recipients’ knowledge. Interestingly, in some other cases, the implications of metaphors transcended the target of the speaker or writer to include some more unexpected dimensions of meaning like acquiring positive implications at the time when negative ones are anticipated, in addition to the fact that they are also a matter of feelings.

Keywords: critical discourse analysis, conceptual metaphor.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Springer.

Charteris-Black, J. (2006). Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Society, 17(5), 563-581.

Davidson, D. (1978). What metaphors mean. Critical inquiry, 5(1), 31-47.

Faircough, N. (2009). A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2, 162-187.

Fairclough, N. (2017). CDA as dialectical reasoning. In The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 13-25). Routledge.

Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.). (2009). Multimodal metaphor (Vol. 11). Walter de Gruyter.

Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and metaphor. AMSTERDAM STUDIES IN THE THEORY AND HISTORY OF LINGUISTIC SCIENCE SERIES 4, 101-124.

Hart, C. (2013). Event-construal in press reports of violence in two recent political protests: A cognitive linguistic approach to CDA. Journal of Language and Politics, 12(3), 400-423.

Hart, C. (2011). Force-interactive patterns in immigration discourse: A Cognitive Linguistic approach to CDA. Discourse & Society, 22(3), 269-286.

Haynes, F. (1975). Metaphor as interactive. Educational Theory, 25(3), 272-277.Retrieved from: Wiley online library

Kövecses, Z. (2008). Conceptual metaphor theory: Some criticisms and alternative proposals. Annual review of cognitive linguistics, 6(1), 168-184.

Kovecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press.

Lakoff, G. (1993). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In Metaphor and Thought. UC Berkeley. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4nv3j5j9.

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980; new edn 2003) Metaphors We Live By, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (2009). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. University of Chicago press.

Maalej, Z. (2007). Doing critical discourse analysis with the contemporary theory of metaphor: Towards a discourse model of metaphor. Cognitive linguistics in critical discourse analysis: Application and theory, 132-158.

Metaphor and politics. Metaphor and symbol, 12(2), 113-133. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net.

Müller, Cornelia. 2008a. Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking. A Dynamic View. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Müller, Cornelia. 2008b. What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor. In: Alan Cienki & Cornelia Müller (eds.), Metaphor and Thought. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 219–245.

Müller, Cornelia & Alan Cienki. 2009. Words, gestures, and beyond: Forms of multimodal metaphor in the use of spoken language. In: Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 297–328

Musolff, A. (2012). The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis. Critical discourse studies, 9(3), 301-310.

Moon, R. (2005). Introducing metaphor. Taylor & Francis.

Fairclough, N. (2017). CDA as dialectical reasoning. In The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 13-25). Routledge.

Ortony, A., Reynolds, R. E., & Arter, J. A. (1977). Metaphor: Theoretical and empirical research. Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report; no. 027.

Perrine, L. (1971). Four forms of metaphor. College English, 33(2), 125-138.

Richards, I. A. (1970). The philosophy of rhetoric. Retrieved from: Phlarchive.org

Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & society, 4(2), 249-283.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2013). Ideology and discourse. The Oxford handbook of political ideologies, 175-196

Wheelwright, P. E. (1962). Metaphor & reality. Retrieved from: Phipapers.org

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2015). Methods of critical discourse studies. Sage.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v3i1.1-13

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Abidi Hajer

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Pragmatics Research is Indexed by:


Creative Commons License

JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS RESEARCH : http://e-journal.iainsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/jopr/index, E-ISSN : 2656-8020 , is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

JoPR E-ISSN : 2656-8020 , is a peer-reviewed academic journal published by State Institute for Islamic Studies (IAIN) Salatiga, Indonesia and published Semi-annually every April and October.


IMPORTANT NOTE: THERE IS NO affiliation, association or endorsement between Elsevier's Journal of Pragmatics and Journal of Pragmatics Research, (JoPR).