Discourse and Power Relations: A Critical Discourse Analysis of a Pakistani Talk Show

Nayab Iqbal, Kaukab Abid Azhar, Zubair Ahmed Shah


The paper aims at studying the ways power and inequality are enacted in a Pakistani talk show aired on Capital TV on 14th August 2019. The research primarily focused on analyzing turn-taking patterns of the discussion held between the host of the program and three guests. The analysis revealed the unequal distribution of turns implying the unequal distribution of power between the host and guests as well as between the guests. The host of the program through her discourse asserted power as she was the one to control the topic of discussion throughout the program. Her power can be attributed to the power of media. Besides, one of the guest speakers, Jawwad asserted his power through his knowledge. The female speaker did not have enough representation and was not given enough chance to share her views, therefore, it can be concluded that gender was another element that played an important part in forming the power relations in the discussion that was observed.

Keywords: Critical Discourse Analysis, Discourse Power Relations, Media Discourse and Talk Shows, Turn-taking

Full Text:



Bardici, M. V. (2012). A Discourse Analysis of the Media Representation of Social Media for Social Change - The Case of Egyptian Revolution and Political Change. Retrieved from http://muep.mau.se/handle/2043/14121

Bhatia, A. (2006). Critical discourse analysis of political press conferences, Critical discourse analysis of political press conferences. Discourse & Society, 17(2), 173–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506058057

Bilal, H. A., Akbar, H. S., Gul, N., & Sial, M. M. (2012). Critical Discourse Analysis of Political TV Talk Shows of Pakistani Media. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v4i3.2263

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge

Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R.(1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In T.Van Dijk (Eds), Discourse as social

interaction (pp.258-284). London: Sage.

McEnery, T., McGlashan, M., & Love, R. (2015). Press and social media reaction to ideologically inspired murder: The case of Lee Rigby, Press and social media reaction to ideologically inspired murder: The case of Lee Rigby. Discourse & Communication, 9(2), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481314568545

Mirazee, S. & Hamidi, H. (2012). Critical Discourse Analysis and Fairclough’s model. ELT Voices-India,

(5), 182-191.



Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243

Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation, Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v2i1.26-40


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Nayab Iqbal, Kaukab Abid Azhar, Zubair Ahmed Shah

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Journal of Pragmatics Research, (JoPR), E-ISSN: 2656-8020, is published by State Institute of Islamic Studies, (IAIN) Salatiga, Indonesia. it is an International forum published every April and October.