Turn Taking in Mata Najwa Talk Show "Ragu-Ragu Perpu" Episode: A Conversational Analysis

Firdaus Habibi, Didin Nuruddin Hidayat, Alek Alek


The present research aims to investigate the key features of turn taking in Mata Najwa talk show about Ragu-ragu Perpu (doubtful of rules of law). In addition, the authors propose to describe the use of turn-taking features between speaker to listener in Mata Najwa talk show. Moreover, The authors utilize a qualitative research methodology by applying a descriptive analysis in the research. To collect the data, the authors select the specific types of turn-taking occured between. In analyzing the data, the authors implemented Jacob L. Mey analysis theory in which selected the types of turn-taking into several forms. For instance, taking the floor (starting up, taking over, interruption, and overlaps), holding the floor, and yielding the floor. The results indicated that the conversation between seven speakers during the talk show are dominated by interruptions and overlapping. It indicates that 24 utterences express the existance of interruptions, while 16 lucutors show the overlapping. Moreover, the speakers tend to use several strategies to hold the talk, including verbal fillers, silent pauses, and lexical repetitions. Within the context of Mata Najwa talk show program, the host of the Mata Najwa tends to apply greetings and questions in yielding the talk to the interlocutors. In conclusion, interruption and overlapping are the two features of turn-taking mostly occured during the conversation.

Full Text:



Anwair, S. (2016). A Study of Turn Taking in Extensive Readng Lecture at English Study Program of Halu Oleo University. 1(2), 1–14.

Chalak, A. (2017). Analysis of Turn Taking and Repair Strategies among Male and Female Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners. 4(2), 1–9.

Corps, R. E., Crossley, A., Gambi, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2018). Early preparation during turn-taking: Listeners use content predictions to determine what to say but not when to say it. Cognition, (V), 77–95.

Corps, R. E., Gambi, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2018). Coordinating Utterances During Turn-Taking: The Role of Prediction, Response Preparation, and Articulation. Discourse Processes, 55(2), 230–240.

Edgerly, S., Gotlieb, M. R., & Vraga, E. K. (2016). “That show really spoke to Me!”: The effects of compatible psychological needs and talk show host style on audience activity. International Journal of Communication.

Faizah, I., & Kurniawan, E. (2016). A Study of Interuption and overlaps in Male-Female Conversations in the Talk Show Mata Najwa. Barista, 3(1), 25–36.

Gautam, J. (2015). Effects of News Talk Shows in Voting Behavior. Journal of Mass Communication & Journalism, 5(6), 1–3.

Ghilzai, S. A., & Baloch, M. (2016). Conversational Analysis of Turn taking Behavior and Gender Differences in Multimodal Conversation. Perspectives in Language, Linguistics and Media, 1, 1–13.

Haqqu, R., Hastjarjo, S., & Slamet, Y. (2019). Teenagers’ Entertainment Satisfaction in Watching Talk Show Program through Youtube. Jurnal The Messenger, 11(1), 38–45.

Hayat, N., Juliana, A. W., & Umber, S. (2015). Role of political talk shows in creating political awareness among Pakistani youth: A case study of general elections 2013. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 23(1), 1–19.

Karasa, M. (2017). Turn-taking and silent learning during open class discussions. ELT Journal, 1–11.

Khoddamy Pour, F., & Yazd, A. L. (2015). Turn Taking in Conversation Analysis. International Journal of Educational Investigations Available Online @ Www.Ijeionline.Com, 2(6), 58–63.

Koudenburg, N., Postmes, T., & Gordijn, E. H. (2017). Beyond Content of Conversation: The Role of Conversational Form in the Emergence and Regulation of Social Structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1–22.

Lestary, A., Krismanti, N., & Hermaniar, Y. (2018). Interruptions and Silences in Conversations: A Turn-Taking Analysis. PAROLE: Journal of Linguistics and Education, 7(2), 53–64.

Mohajer, L., & Mohd. Jan, J. (2018). Building solidarity through interruption in face-to-face interaction amongst Iranian Men. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 18(2), 46–58.

Mustikaningtyas, Z., Setiawan, D., & Lisdawati, I. (2019). ANALYZE TURN TAKING IN TALK SHOW ABOUT. 2(4), 489–493.

O’Reilly, M., & Lester, J. (2019). Applied conversation analysis for counselling and psychotherapy researchers. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 4–8.

Prihastuti, Y. S., & Yusuf, F. N. (2019). Conversation Analysis: Turn taking marker in Catatan Najwa (Setia Pengacara Setya, Part 1). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 523–528.

Rahman, M. S. (2016). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Language “Testing and Assessment” Research: A Literature Review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102–112.

Ruark, A., & Fielding-Miller, R. (2016). Using qualitative methods to validate and contextualize quantitative findings: A case study of research on sexual behavior and gender-based violence among young Swazi women. Global Health Science and Practice, pp. 373–383.

Subiyanto, A. S. (2017). Turn-Taking in Colloquial Indonesian. Nusa: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 12(4), 238–248.

Tao, Y. (2018). Interruption Elicits Laughter: Cooperative and Intrusive Interruptions in a Chinese Talk Show Host’s Conversation. Studies in English Language Teaching, 6(4), 287–311.

Trena M. Paulus, University of Georgia, Amber N. Warren, University of Nevada, R., Jessica N. Lester, & Indiana University. (2018). Using Conversation Analysis to Understand How Agreements, Personal Experiences, and Cognition Verbs Function in Online Discussions. Language@internet.

Wells, B., Beeston, A. V., Bradley, E., Brown, G. J., Crook, H., & Kurtić, E. (2019). Talking in Time: The development of a self-administered conversation analysis based training programme for cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants International, 20(5), 255–265.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v2i1.80-96


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Firdaus Habibi, Didin Nuruddin Hidayat, Alek Alek

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Pragmatics Research, (JoPR), E-ISSN: 2656-8020, is published by State Institute of Islamic Studies, (IAIN) Salatiga, Indonesia. it is an International forum published every April and October.